FilmJabber Movie Reviews

Login | Join | Help

Search

Elephant (2003) - Movie Review

Elephant movie poster
FilmJabber
B+
Users
NA
Rate this movie
Rate It:
My Grade
NA
Write a review
Buy DVD at Amazon

Gus Van Sant explores the mystery of high school shootings with the chilling and suspenseful film Elephant, which follows several students on what seems like a normal day. But, before the school bell rings, many of them will have been gunned down by two of their classmates.

Van Sant, whose other 2003 movie was simplistic yet moving Gerry (and whose past credits include Good Will Hunting), applies the same simplistic techniques to Elephant. Elephant, by all means, is a simple movie. Technically, the camera work is slow and methodical, sometimes following various characters around for minutes on end without breaking away. The movie does jump around chronologically, showing how different characters progressed through the day. One of the most powerful scenes of the movie is where one of the students, Alex (Alex Frost) is sitting at home, playing the piano. The scene is as simple as that, but it is clear that this is the calm before the storm, as Alex and his friend Eric are going to return to school and murder everyone they can find.

The slow, "rolling hills" style of Van Sant does become tedious at times. He does a very good job at making the movie suspenseful, because you are just waiting for that first shot to be fired, but very little happens for the first hour. That does not mean that the first hour is boring (or that the final twenty minutes are "exciting"), but there are a few stretches that seem a little ambiguous. Obviously, Van Sant is trying to show that all of the characters in the movie, aside from the two killers, are doing exactly what they do every day of their lives - process film, talk about boys, kiss their girlfriends, sit in class - but a few moments just do not work.

My other complaint is that this high school did not remind me of the high school that I went to in any way or form (and that was only four years ago). Most of the movie seems to take place during a lunch period, but having come from a school where students weren't just allowed to roam around as freely as the students are allowed to here, things seemed odd. Only one little group is shown in a class setting, and everything else seems a little surreal. Perhaps that is the point.

I also did not like the homosexual moment given to the killers before the shooting spree; I did not like my interpretation on what this was meant to indicate.

Elephant does succeed in shocking its audience. There is very little blood in the movie, and not too many people are actually showed being gunned down, but the implication is more than enough. As Alex and Eric (Eric Deulen) roam the hallways in search of future targets, their casual indifference to what they are doing is downright chilling. The final seconds of the film will make your hair stand on end. The final minutes are where Elephant finds its strength and power; it is hard to determine whether is good or is good only because it shocks and hits hard to home.

The actors should also be given credit, as most of them had never acted professionally before. All are more than believable.

Elephant is a chilling and shocking film that benefits from the mastery of Gus Van Sant and its actors - there are no people more fitting to play students than students themselves. While shocking, the movie seems to be more of an observation than a statement, and for that I did not find it as powerful as I wanted to be. For those who can handle such a film, it is still worth seeing.

Comments

Anonymous says:

July 4, 2005

Why was the clock striking 5:00 on the same day the killer went home and then returned to school to do the killings? I didn't understand this because everyone remained in the same clothes as though it were the same day. Sorry, I know this is besides the point but it bothered me. I realize there is a great chance that I missed something here.

Anonymous says:

July 4, 2005

To A.H. who wondered why it was called Elephant...Besides the fact that there is an elephant bed cover in the movie, seems to me an elephant is about the most obvious of creatures. It should be equally obvious that we all need positive attention from each other and we're all not getting enough--or we could use more of it. I wish Gus would submit a comment. The unbearable fact is this movie was based on reality. Heartbreaking.

Anonymous says:

June 12, 2004

I absoultly loved this movie! The characters where so real, it was like I was actually in the school next to the characters. All the problems in this movie are so real in actual highschools. Bulemia, out casts, family troubles, and inter-school relationships. I would reccomend this movie for ANY highschool student.

Anonymous says:

June 2, 2004

Ok I would like to first mention my thoughts on what Chris Fortune had to say about this movie. As some of his ideas are provoking and make you think I believe that they are not true. First off: I do not think that Van Sant was saying that this little instances of picking on of the killers are what made them snap, Van Sant is showing that this stuff happens everyday, and probably has for years. The killers go threw their day being picked on and tourmented, they are sick of life and all of its hardships. Also you are thinking to hard about the video game, sure maybe Van Sant didn't use a real game because of legal issues but I think that it shows that they killers had been thinking about this for a long time and practicing on the game, I mean the white background symbolizes the innocence of the people and their faceless heads and plan bodies show that the killers don't care who they get, as long as they get a lot. Second: the whole buying gun's off the internet just show's how easy it is to go and buy something to destroy the lives of many others. And third: I don't think that the character's were gay, they were thinking about what was going to happen later and the realization that they will never be with another person. If they were gay though it would also present the idea that everyone picked on them for that. That they had been "outed" and that now their lives are hell...The whole discussion of how can you tell a person is gay shadow's the thought that these two boy's were "outed" and humiliated for it. In the end I believe that this movie is a real eye opener on how we treat people and how to prevent these things from happening. I do have a few complaints though, like when John is told not to go back into the school, how come he doesn't call the police or pull the fire alarm, and when he meets his father he doesn't seem to disturbed with the horrorific event's that just happened in his school, and why does Benny just walk around and go to the killer? I would've got the f*#% out of there! I also wish that there was more special feature's on the making of this movie and that they would explain more. Otherwise this movie is great and should be shown to many to open up their eyes and help people to realize what they are doing when they pick on other's. We need to accept and tolerate all and we shouldn't treat anyone any different from what we want to be treated...or else...

Anonymous says:

April 5, 2004

WARNING: spoilers ahead I got a way different message from Elephant than Chris Fortune (You can't do the impossible - 3/28/2004) did it seems. I didn't think the movie was pointing the finger at anyone or anything to blame. This movie doesn't at all attempt to answer 'why?' On the contrary, I think the movie leaves more questions than answers, we aren't given sufficient character development or background to attempt to ask why these kids killed their classmates. It was a snapshot into the lives of several school kids from an average school. It showed that the lives of these kids was quite unremarkable and not of such miserable pain that it could be expected for them to have undertaken their horrific blood letting. As you said Chris, many kids are made fun of, thrown food at, and oftentimes worse. This does not drive them to shoot their classmates (while deriving great pleasure out of it at the same time). I can't say that it was an "entertaining" movie and yes, there was one to two scenes where I thought this could have been shortened a little, but I thought this was a very clever film. I was expecting it to be a tear jerker but it showed nothing in the way of tragedy or pulled for emotion, it was shocking - I left this movie feeling numb, almost like shock. and was speechless for the next half hr or so. Warren PS you can interprete what you like from the boys getting into the shower together scene but i don't think its a statement that the killers were gay. One of them says as he gets into the shower with the other guy 'i've never kissed anyone before'(at least i think thats what he said). To me it suggests that the enormity of what they were about to do was being realised at that time and perhaps they were thinking 'what the hell' to everything by that stage (Note: Not too many gay lovers shoot each other in the head).

No HTML. Be kind - your mom might read what you say.

You must be logged in to comment. Log in now.
Not a member? Join for free.