Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (2002) - Movie Review
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets, no longer suffering from duel titles as the first film did (as everyone knows, everywhere else in the world the original was called The Philosopher's Stone because apparently American children are too stupid to be interested in a book with such a high-class title), brings back all of the characters from the first one to once again pit Harry, Ron and Hermione against a dark force that is undoubtedly linked to Lord Voldemort in some way. Harry is hearing voices, the other students suspect him of murder, and there are rumors of a giant serpent lurking through the school corridors. Death is around every corner.
Director Chris Columbus did an exceptional job of sticking to the book in the original, throwing in most of even the little things that J.K. Rowling's books are known for. He put Rowling's vision on the big screen, and did a heck of a job at it. Upon my first viewing of the original, I felt that he almost left too much in - the movie ranged in at two-and-a-half hours, a very long time for little children. Upon viewing it the second time, and the third time, and the fourth time, I am thankful that he left in all of the little stuff that makes Harry Potter so great.
Having established himself as "the Harry Potter director," Columbus was given more leeway this time in adapting "The Chamber of Secrets." This time around, the movie is more plot-focused, but at the expense of the loss of several funny little tidbits. The extractions are minor, but I felt disappointed that some of my favorite moments in the book (of what I can remember, having read the book in the summer of 2001) were not in the movie. "The Chamber of Secrets" is my favorite book, but I cannot say that about the movie, at least after only watching it once. The first third of the movie seems rushed as Columbus cuts and skims the scenes...
But the final two thirds are the pay-off. Though it is disappointing that certain scenes were removed, the movie overall is anything but. In the original, Columbus had to be very careful to stay true to everything, as well as introduce the characters and the setting. In the second film, he assumes that the audience knows the characters and cuts right to the chase. The final two thirds of The Chamber of Secrets is more consistent, more exciting, and much darker than anything The Sorcerer's Stone could offer; this is Columbus in his finest moment. The first movie was funny and entertaining; the second is funny, entertaining and suspenseful. Grown adults were shaking in their seats at times.
Everything about The Chamber of Secrets is done better than in its predecessor; the story flows better, the visual effects are much better, and the characters are more fun to watch. Just a year has passed since the previous film, but puberty has set in and all of the actors are taller, stronger and more mature, as is the movie (and by taller I mean this movie is eight minutes longer than the original). The spider sequence, as well as the ending are done superbly; they are more thrilling and exciting than most horror movies these days.
Given the warnings by Columbus to keep little kids away, parents might be a little concerned about taking their little ones to see it. My view is that yes, younger children might be frightened a few times throughout the film, but kids are allowed to be scared, aren't they? Most of the movie is funny and exciting, not scary; they're going to enjoy it no matter what.
As for me, The Chamber of Secrets is done better than the original, with much improved special effects and more suspense. The book is funnier than the predecessor but the movie is not. Either way, they are both really close, and will definitely end up on some Top Ten lists.
Comments
No HTML. Be kind - your mom might read what you say.
|
Home |
Movies |
Movie Reviews |
Blog |
Media |
DVD |
Contests |
Links |
About Us |
Contact Us Movie reviews © 2003-2009 Erik Samdahl. All other content © of its respected owner. Read our Privacy Policy |




Anonymous says:
May 30, 2005i sat down to watch this pile of shite and let me tell u after it made me want to kill myself. the actors are a bunch of mentally handicapped monkeys. the stuff that comes out of my ass makes better things than this movie.however the movie did not stop me spunking all over the television screen. all in all the worest and gayyest thing on the screen
Anonymous says:
July 10, 2004I don't give two cents for who's hot or not in this movie. The basic fact is that it was well done!
So why the 'D' rating you might ask? Laugh at me if you will, but it's mostly personal bias. I'm a Christian, I'm not ashamed of it, and I don't care how much you cuss at me, althougyh I'd prefer that you didn't.
In the scene when Professor McGonagall teaches transfiguration, and turns a bird into a cup, upside-down black crosses are part of the artwork. This used to be a Satanic symbol, but has now been adopted as being simply 'antichristian.'
I found nothing like this in the books at all, and I've read all five that have come out so far. J.K. Rowling is an excellent writter, but somethings twisted in at the movies...
Anonymous says:
March 19, 2004Who wants to bet that I'm the only person over the age of thirteen reviewing this movie?! What do I think, you ask? I think it sucked. It hardly followed the books, which were bad enough! Why did they make movies?! The only reason anyone watches these horrors is because "tom felton is soooo hot!! what a Q-T!!!" "omg! i luv daniel radcliffe!!" UGH!! Shut up you pubescent pre-teens! It sucked! Face the facts! Oh, and I have a secret...*are you ready?* NONE OF THEM CAN ACT FOR A CUP OF BEANS!!! Sorry...I know is must hurt... Feh.
Anonymous says:
March 17, 2004MMMMM Tom Felton aka Draco Malfoy....ur sooo hot in this movie....u look like Kevin Clark which is also a total hottie!! cant wait for that 3rd movie to come out...!!! god DAMN ur hot!!! holy crap!! love yah!!