Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (2005) - Movie Details
Rate It:
My Grade
NA
NA
| Release Date: | November 18, 2005 |
| On DVD: | March 7, 2006 |
| Genre: | Family, Action, Comedy, Sci-Fi |
| Director: | Mike Newell |
| Writer: | Steve Kloves |
| Cast: | Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, Maggie Smith, Alan Rickman, Robbie Coltrane, David Bradley, Fiona Shaw, Julie Walters, Mark Williams, David Thewlis, Jim Tavare, Timothy Spall, Michael Gambon, Brendan Gleeson, Frances de la Tour |
| AKA: | Harry Potter 4 |
| Studio: | Warner Brothers |
| Official site: | gobletoffire.com |
| Running Time: | 150 minutes |
| MPAA Rating: | Rated PG-13 for sequences of fantasy violence and frightening images. |
Harry Potter returns for his fourth year of school, only to find that Quidditch this year has been replaced with a tournament that hasn't been done in 100 years. Like usual, something dark and insidious is brewing at Hogwarts, and it is only a matter of time before He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named returns......
Full synopsis »
Movie Review
A well-done, visually stimulating, emotionally draining action flick that finally takes Harry Potter out of the family genre and into the place where it needs to be to successfully tell its story, "Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire" is probably the best of the series. Full movie review »
Movie Photos
Comments
No HTML. Be kind - your mom might read what you say.
Home |
Movies |
Movie Reviews |
Blog |
Media |
DVD |
Contests |
Links |
About Us |
Contact Us  Movie reviews © 2003-2009 Erik Samdahl. All other content © of its respected owner. Read our Privacy Policy |
CMDRcody019 says:
November 11, 2009i personally liked the movie, it caught my attention and kept me watching.
Anonymous says:
February 17, 2006Dear J.K. Rowling,
I really love this book.Next weekend,I'm probably going to see it's film too.I'm on page 650,The Death Eaters,of chapter thirty three.My parents call me The Speady Reader since my mother is on book 2(Harry Potter And The Chamber Of Secrets) and my father is on book 1(Harry Potter And The Sorcer's Stone).I guess the book is at least a 1/2 an inch scary,but I'm not scared that easily.I can't wait to start book 5!
Write back if you can.
Sincerely,
Sarah Zakula
Anonymous says:
January 21, 2006These pictures are so cool!!! They are clear and are not fuzzy at all.
Thanks so much for posting them!!!!!!!!!
Anonymous says:
December 15, 2005This movie as a whole was the best so far and it held its own as a 'movie,' not just as an interpretation of a book. Very exciting visually and emotionally. You can definately see the kids growing as actors in this one. From the first movie where they had almost no acting experience to this one you can see there's been a great distance covered. They did very, very well. Overall I liked most of the choices in the film, with the exclusion of maybe one or two things, but I'm very satisfied altogether with RF's Voldemort. He was scary like a cult leader. Very well done.
Anonymous says:
December 9, 2005Harry Potter was deffinately the best of the series. But I really think Daniel Radcliffe was the worst part of the film. He is not a good actor and not many people say this on television. He doesn't look like he's be chosen in any other films. even so, the film was the best so far and Maggie Smith and Alan Ricman were fantastic. I don't think Ralpf Fiennes was very good as Voldermort.